Semiotic Analysis of Text on the Bada Valley Loga Statues
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Bada Valley in Central Sulawesi is a megalithic site rich in cultural heritage, one of which is the Loga Statue. This statue holds a historical and symbolic value that is intriguing to analyze through the semiotics of texts to understand its embedded meanings. This study aims to analyze the visual and symbolic signs of the Loga Statue using the semiotic approaches of Peirce and Barthes. The analysis seeks to identify how icons, indices, and symbols on the statue represent the cultural and spiritual aspects of the society that created it. The research employs a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis. Data collection is conducted through direct observation, documentation, and relevant literature studies. The data is then analyzed using semiotic methods to reveal the denotative, connotative, and mythological meanings embedded in the statue. The findings indicate that the Loga Statue possesses symbolic representations related to the animistic-dynamistic beliefs of prehistoric communities. The form and carvings on the statue contain spiritual meanings that reflect the close relationship between humans and the supernatural world. Additionally, the visual patterns on the statue suggest a visual communication system used by past societies to express their cultural values.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
[2] T. Steimer-Herbet, Indonesian Megaliths: A Forgotten Cultural Heritage. Archaeopress Publishing Ltd, 2018. doi: 10.2307/jj.15136043.
[3] R. Chahyadi, “Menjejakkan Kaki di Lore Lindu, Situs Megalitikum Tertua,” detiktravel. Accessed: May 19, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://travel.detik.com/cerita-perjalanan/d-5389870/menjejakkan-kaki-di-lore-lindu-situs-megalitikum-tertua
[4] Nidyah Widyamurti, J. Jauhari, and S. H. Yudhanto, “Kajian Sosio Semiotika Megalitikum Pada Sistus Tantaduo Taman Nasional Lore Lindu,” Brikolase : Jurnal Kajian Teori, Praktik dan Wacana Seni Budaya Rupa, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 126–142, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.33153/brikolase.v16i2.6242.
[5] BPCB Gorontalo, “ARCA MEGALITIK LOGA, SULAWESI TENGAH,” Balai Pelestarian Cagar Budaya Gorontalo, Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Accessed: Mar. 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://kebudayaan.kemdikbud.go.id/bpcbgorontalo/arca-megalitik-loga-sulawesi-tengah/
[6] R. Kusumo, “Patung Megalitikum Lore Lindu Bukti Peradaban Besar di Sulteng,” GoodNews From Indonesia. Accessed: Mar. 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.goodnewsfromindonesia.id/2021/11/05/patung-megalitikum-lore-lindu-bukti-peradaban-besar-di-sulteng
[7] A. Setyawan and S. H. Yudhanto, “Langke Bulawa Statue in the perspective of review Bada valley site culture,” Gelar : Jurnal Seni Budaya, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 25–36, May 2024, doi: 10.33153/glr.v22i1.5923.
[8] A. L. Nesterkina, A. A. Portnova, A. A. Fedorova, and L. Yondri, “The Megalithic Tradition of East and Southeast Asia,” Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 39–48, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.17746/1563-0110.2022.50.3.039-048.
[9] R. BAZANCİR, “Clifford Geertz’s Approach to Interpretational Anthropology and Cultural Relativity and Critics,” YAZIT Kültür Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 225–241, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.59902/yazit.1321431.
[10] “Victor Turner’s Theory of Symbols: The Symbolism of a Religious Site and Object in a Rural Environment in Eastern Slovakia,” Religion and Society in Central and Eastern Europe, vol. 13, no. 1, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.20413/rascee.2020.13.1.21-41.
[11] A. Asa Berger and A. A. Berger, What Objects Mean. Routledge, 2016. doi: 10.4324/9781315415857.
[12] F. M. A. Kaba, “Tapak Waktu Megasitus Lore.” Accessed: Dec. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/25754/1/BPCB_LORELINDU_JUNI2021_HAQ07.mp4
[13] Moh Arsyal, Shity Rahma Watie, Mochtar Zein, Nabila N, and Abd. Gafur, “ETHONOSPHER MEGALIT: KEHIDUPAN MASYARAKAT DAN MEGALITIK DI LEMBAH BEHOA,” Cultural Diversity: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya, vol. 1, no. 1, 2024.
[14] A. Iliopoulos, “The Evolution of Material Signification: Tracing the Origins of Symbolic Body Ornamentation through a Pragmatic and Enactive Theory of Cognitive Semiotics,” Signs and Society, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 244–277, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1086/688619.
[15] J. Anderson and M.-K. Lotman, “Intrasemiotic translation in the emulations of ancient art: On the example of the collections of the University of Tartu Art Museum,” Semiotica, vol. 2018, no. 222, pp. 1–24, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1515/sem-2016-0118.
[16] S. H. Yudhanto, F. Risdianto, and A. T. Artanto, “Cultural and Communication Approaches in the Design of Visual Communication Design Works,” Journal of Linguistics, Culture and Communication, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 79–90, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.61320/jolcc.v1i1.79-90.
[17] E. V. Américo, “O conceito de fronteira na semiótica de Iúri Lotman,” Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos do Discurso, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 5–20, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1590/2176-457326361.
[18] S. Caillaud, M. Doumergue, M. Préau, V. Haas, and N. Kalampalikis, “The past and present of triangulation and social representations theory: A crossed history,” Qual Res Psychol, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 375–391, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1080/14780887.2019.1605272.
[19] A. Syukur, A. Ardiansyah, and Kurniawati, “The Use of Historical Sources in History Learning,” in ICHELSS: International Conference on Humanities, Education, Law, and Social Sciences , Universitas Negeri Jakarta, 2021.
[20] G. Aiello, “Visual Semiotics: Key Concepts and New Directions,” in The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. London: SAGE Publications, 2019.
[21] C. Bianchi, “Thresholds, boundaries, limits: Ideological analysis in the semiotics of Umberto Eco,” Semiotica, vol. 2015, no. 206, pp. 109–127, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1515/sem-2015-0015.
[22] A. Winter, “Race, Multiculturalism and the ‘Progressive’ Politics of London 2012: Passing the ‘Boyle Test,’” Sociol Res Online, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 137–143, May 2013, doi: 10.5153/sro.3069.
[23] A. Risi and Z. Zulkifli, “Kajian Semiotika Ilustrasi Digital Karya Agung Budi Santoso (Pendekatan Semiotika Roland Barthes),” MAVIS : Jurnal Desain Komunikasi Visual, vol. 4, no. 02, pp. 47–55, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.32664/mavis.v4i02.739.
[24] W. Kaudern, “Temuan Megalitik di Sulawesi Tengah,” LOBO Annals of Sulawesi Research, vol. 6, no. 1, 2022.
[25] M. Rahmat, Siti Hajar N. Aepu, I. Hatta, and Hapsa, “MO LALUTA: STUDI ETNOGRAFI SEMIOTIK PADA SITUS MEGALIT DI LEMBAH BADA,” Cultural Diversity: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya, vol. 1, no. 1, 2024.
[26] T. Steimer and M. Besse, “Indonesian Megaliths as the Result of the Interaction between Indigenous Peoples and Hindu-Buddhist Kingdoms,” in Proceedings the International Symposium on Austronesian Diaspora, Mar. 2016.
[27] G. Onosu, “The Impact of Cultural Immersion Experience on Identity Transformation Process,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 18, no. 5, p. 2680, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052680.
[28] I. G. N. T. Marutama, A. Setyawan, and S. H. Yudhanto, “Perspektif Visual dan Interaksi nilai Budaya di Situs Pokekea,” Narada : Jurnal Desain dan Seni, vol. 11, no. 3, 2024.